
Report March 2025
Your organisation description
Advertising
Commitment 1
Relevant signatories participating in ad placements commit to defund the dissemination of disinformation, and improve the policies and systems which determine the eligibility of content to be monetised, the controls for monetisation and ad placement, and the data to report on the accuracy and effectiveness of controls and services around ad placements.
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 1.1 Measure 1.2 Measure 1.3 Measure 1.5 Measure 1.6
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 1.1
Relevant Signatories involved in the selling of advertising, inclusive of media platforms, publishers and ad tech companies, will deploy, disclose, and enforce policies with the aims of: - first avoiding the publishing and carriage of harmful Disinformation to protect the integrity of advertising supported businesses - second taking meaningful enforcement and remediation steps to avoid the placement of advertising next to Disinformation content or on sources that repeatedly violate these policies; and - third adopting measures to enable the verification of the landing / destination pages of ads and origin of ad placement.
QRE 1.1.1
Signatories will disclose and outline the policies they develop, deploy, and enforce to meet the goals of Measure 1.1 and will link to relevant public pages in their help centres.
SLI 1.1.1
Signatories will report, quantitatively, on actions they took to enforce each of the policies mentioned in the qualitative part of this service level indicator, at the Member State or language level. This could include, for instance, actions to remove, to block, or to otherwise restrict advertising on pages and/or domains that disseminate harmful Disinformation.
- “Domain” represents the number of web domains which received at least one page view in a Member State. Since Microsoft Advertising blocks domains across all regions (meaning, we don’t break down the blocks at the individual country level because we apply the same globally), we are reporting on the overall number across all Member States for the current reporting period.
Country | Page Views | Domain |
---|---|---|
Austria | 460,850 | |
Belgium | 0 | |
Bulgaria | 3,504 | |
Croatia | 5,079 | |
Cyprus | 3,950 | |
Czech Republic | 75,076 | |
Denmark | 95,138 | |
Estonia | 1,438 | |
Finland | 0 | |
France | 1,784,624 | |
Germany | 4,418,339 | |
Greece | 0 | |
Hungary | 11,815 | |
Ireland | 326,844 | |
Italy | 8,256,291 | |
Latvia | 468 | |
Lithuania | 1,386 | |
Luxembourg | 0 | |
Malta | 3,032 | |
Netherlands | 0 | |
Poland | 23,777 | |
Portugal | 0 | |
Romania | 20,952 | |
Slovakia | 0 | |
Slovenia | 0 | |
Spain | 0 | |
Sweden | 0 | |
Iceland | 0 | |
Liechtenstein | 0 | |
Norway | 96,441 | |
Total EU | 15,492,563 | 158 |
Total EEA | 15,589,004 | 158 |
Measure 1.2
Relevant Signatories responsible for the selling of advertising, inclusive of publishers, media platforms, and ad tech companies, will tighten eligibility requirements and content review processes for content monetisation and ad revenue share programmes on their services as necessary to effectively scrutinise parties and bar participation by actors who systematically post content or engage in behaviours which violate policies mentioned in Measure 1.1 that tackle Disinformation.
QRE 1.2.1
Signatories will outline their processes for reviewing, assessing, and augmenting their monetisation policies in order to scrutinise and bar participation by actors that systematically provide harmful Disinformation.
As stated in our revised policies, “We may use a combination of internal signals and trusted third-party data or information sources to reject, block, or take down ads or sites that contain disinformation or send traffic to pages containing disinformation.”
SLI 1.2.1
Signatories will report on the number of policy reviews and/or updates to policies relevant to Measure 1.2 throughout the reporting period. In addition, Signatories will report on the numbers of accounts or domains barred from participation to advertising or monetisation as a result of these policies at the Member State level.
Nr of policy reviews | Nr of updates to policies | Nr of accounts barred | Nr of domains barred | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Global | Zero (0) | Zero (0) | Zero (0) | 158 |
Measure 1.3
Relevant Signatories responsible for the selling of advertising, inclusive of publishers, media platforms, and ad tech companies, will take commercial and technically feasible steps, including support for relevant third-party approaches, to give advertising buyers transparency on the placement of their advertising.
QRE 1.3.1
Signatories will report on the controls and transparency they provide to advertising buyers with regards to the placement of their ads as it relates to Measure 1.3.
- Syndication Publisher Network Opt-Out: ability to prevent any ad delivery on the extended publisher network. In which case, all ads will serve on owned and operated properties.
Measure 1.5
Relevant Signatories involved in the reporting of monetisation activities inclusive of media platforms, ad networks, and ad verification companies will take the necessary steps to give industry-recognised relevant independent third-party auditors commercially appropriate and fair access to their services and data in order to: - First, confirm the accuracy of first party reporting relative to monetisation and Disinformation, seeking alignment with regular audits performed under the DSA. - Second, accreditation services should assess the effectiveness of media platforms' policy enforcement, including Disinformation policies.
QRE 1.5.1
Signatories that produce first party reporting will report on the access provided to independent third-party auditors as outlined in Measure 1.5 and will link to public reports and results from such auditors, such as MRC Content Level Brand Safety Accreditation, TAG Brand Safety certifications, or other similarly recognised industry accepted certifications.
QRE 1.5.2
Signatories that conduct independent accreditation via audits will disclose areas of their accreditation that have been updated to reflect needs in Measure 1.5.
Measure 1.6
Relevant Signatories will advance the development, improve the availability, and take practical steps to advance the use of brand safety tools and partnerships, with the following goals: - To the degree commercially viable, relevant Signatories will provide options to integrate information and analysis from source-raters, services that provide indicators of trustworthiness, fact-checkers, researchers or other relevant stakeholders providing information e.g., on the sources of Disinformation campaigns to help inform decisions on ad placement by ad buyers, namely advertisers and their agencies. - Advertisers, agencies, ad tech companies, and media platforms and publishers will take effective and reasonable steps to integrate the use of brand safety tools throughout the media planning, buying and reporting process, to avoid the placement of their advertising next to Disinformation content and/or in places or sources that repeatedly publish Disinformation. - Brand safety tool providers and rating services who categorise content and domains will provide reasonable transparency about the processes they use, insofar that they do not release commercially sensitive information or divulge trade secrets, and that they establish a mechanism for customer feedback and appeal.
QRE 1.6.1
Signatories that place ads will report on the options they provide for integration of information, indicators and analysis from source raters, services that provide indicators of trustworthiness, fact-checkers, researchers, or other relevant stakeholders providing information e.g. on the sources of Disinformation campaigns to help inform decisions on ad placement by buyers.
QRE 1.6.2
Signatories that purchase ads will outline the steps they have taken to integrate the use of brand safety tools in their advertising and media operations, disclosing what percentage of their media investment is protected by such services.
QRE 1.6.3
Signatories that provide brand safety tools will outline how they are ensuring transparency and appealability about their processes and outcomes.
QRE 1.6.4
Relevant Signatories that rate sources to determine if they persistently publish Disinformation shall provide reasonable information on the criteria under which websites are rated, make public the assessment of the relevant criteria relating to Disinformation, operate in an apolitical manner and give publishers the right to reply before ratings are published.
SLI 1.6.1
Signatories that purchase ads will outline the steps they have taken to integrate the use of brand safety tools in their advertising and media operations, disclosing what percentage of their media investment is protected by such services.
Commitment 2
Relevant Signatories participating in advertising commit to prevent the misuse of advertising systems to disseminate Disinformation in the form of advertising messages.
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 2.1 Measure 2.2 Measure 2.3 Measure 2.4
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
- Iterated on its automated detection mechanisms
- Improve AI model to detect clickbait and low-quality ads
- Continue expanding to multiple internal domain trust signals as well as partner signals to make domain detection more robust
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 2.1
Relevant Signatories will develop, deploy, and enforce appropriate and tailored advertising policies that address the misuse of their advertising systems for propagating harmful Disinformation in advertising messages and in the promotion of content.
QRE 2.1.1
Signatories will disclose and outline the policies they develop, deploy, and enforce to meet the goals of Measure 2.1 and will link to relevant public pages in their help centres.
SLI 2.1.1
Signatories will report, quantitatively, on actions they took to enforce each of the policies mentioned in the qualitative part of this service level indicator, at the Member State or language level. This could include, for instance, actions to remove, to block, or to otherwise restrict harmful Disinformation in advertising messages and in the promotion of content.
Country | Unique Ads | Blocked Impressions | Unique Domains | Account suspension |
---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | 45,895 | 15,099,520 | 432 | 321 |
Belgium | 13,602 | 16,341,515 | 489 | 679 |
Bulgaria | 8,414 | 846,117 | 344 | 140 |
Croatia | 5,557 | 589,799 | 254 | 25 |
Cyprus | 6,005 | 385,434 | 285 | 139 |
Czech Republic | 9,385 | 4,020,308 | 368 | 296 |
Denmark | 11,955 | 3,736,810 | 377 | 453 |
Estonia | 5,023 | 394,036 | 241 | 161 |
Finland | 9,004 | 2,929,201 | 348 | 556 |
France | 22,321 | 33,941,040 | 693 | 4378 |
Germany | 184,877 | 169,260,210 | 735 | 7277 |
Greece | 6,960 | 1,554,682 | 375 | 290 |
Hungary | 8,412 | 1,381,649 | 336 | 61 |
Ireland | 10,087 | 6,351,043 | 431 | 351 |
Italy | 17,654 | 18,995,565 | 580 | 2022 |
Latvia | 5,296 | 418,449 | 254 | 97 |
Lithuania | 7,644 | 732,340 | 313 | 197 |
Luxembourg | 5,616 | 736,362 | 300 | 43 |
Malta | 4,377 | 274,817 | 241 | 27 |
Netherlands | 13,072 | 13,276,757 | 579 | 1511 |
Poland | 10,657 | 5,351,377 | 464 | 1068 |
Portugal | 11,122 | 6,574,294 | 452 | 235 |
Romania | 8,605 | 3,557,594 | 407 | 427 |
Slovakia | 6,654 | 1,064,249 | 284 | 50 |
Slovenia | 4,950 | 520,188 | 241 | 48 |
Spain | 18,471 | 19,365,688 | 605 | 2857 |
Sweden | 13,051 | 7,940,119 | 464 | 551 |
Iceland | 3,771 | 312,425 | 222 | 23 |
Liechtenstein | 1,058 | 61,850 | 126 | 5 |
Norway | 13,590 | 3,895,944 | 411 | 426 |
Global | 2,193,970 | - | - | - |
Total EU | 2,668,636 | 335,639,163 | 10,892 | 24,260 |
Total EEA | 2,687,055 | 339,909,383 | 11,651 | 24,714 |
Measure 2.2
Relevant Signatories will develop tools, methods, or partnerships, which may include reference to independent information sources both public and proprietary (for instance partnerships with fact-checking or source rating organisations, or services providing indicators of trustworthiness, or proprietary methods developed internally) to identify content and sources as distributing harmful Disinformation, to identify and take action on ads and promoted content that violate advertising policies regarding Disinformation mentioned in Measure 2.1.
QRE 2.2.1
Signatories will describe the tools, methods, or partnerships they use to identify content and sources that contravene policies mentioned in Measure 2.1 - while being mindful of not disclosing information that'd make it easier for malicious actors to circumvent these tools, methods, or partnerships. Signatories will specify the independent information sources involved in these tools, methods, or partnerships.
Measure 2.3
Relevant Signatories will adapt their current ad verification and review systems as appropriate and commercially feasible, with the aim of preventing ads placed through or on their services that do not comply with their advertising policies in respect of Disinformation to be inclusive of advertising message, promoted content, and site landing page.
QRE 2.3.1
Signatories will describe the systems and procedures they use to ensure that ads placed through their services comply with their advertising policies as described in Measure 2.1.
SLI 2.3.1
Signatories will report quantitatively, at the Member State level, on the ads removed or prohibited from their services using procedures outlined in Measure 2.3. In the event of ads successfully removed, parties should report on the reach of violatory content and advertising.
Country | Nr of ads removed (as well as reach of ads before they were successfully removed) | Nr of ads prohibited (same as Unique Ads in SLI 2.1.1) |
---|---|---|
Austria | 2,527 | 2,239,865 |
Belgium | 2,527 | 2,207,572 |
Bulgaria | 2,527 | 2,202,384 |
Croatia | 2,527 | 2,199,527 |
Cyprus | 2,527 | 2,199,975 |
Czech Republic | 2,527 | 2,203,355 |
Denmark | 2,527 | 2,205,925 |
Estonia | 2,527 | 2,198,993 |
Finland | 2,527 | 2,202,974 |
France | 2,527 | 2,216,291 |
Germany | 2,527 | 2,378,847 |
Greece | 2,527 | 2,200,930 |
Hungary | 2,527 | 2,202,382 |
Ireland | 2,527 | 2,204,057 |
Italy | 2,527 | 2,211,624 |
Latvia | 2,527 | 2,199,266 |
Lithuania | 2,527 | 2,201,614 |
Luxembourg | 2,527 | 2,199,586 |
Malta | 2,527 | 2,198,347 |
Netherlands | 2,527 | 2,207,042 |
Poland | 2,527 | 2,204,627 |
Portugal | 2,527 | 2,205,092 |
Romania | 2,527 | 2,202,575 |
Slovakia | 2,527 | 2,200,624 |
Slovenia | 2,527 | 2,198,920 |
Spain | 2,527 | 2,212,441 |
Sweden | 2,527 | 2,207,021 |
Iceland | 2,527 | 2,197,741 |
Liechtenstein | 2,527 | 2,195,028 |
Norway | 2,527 | 2,207,560 |
Total EU | 2,527 | 59,711,856 |
Total EEA | 2,527 | 66,312,185 |
Measure 2.4
Relevant Signatories will provide relevant information to advertisers about which advertising policies have been violated when they reject or remove ads violating policies described in Measure 2.1 above or disable advertising accounts in application of these policies and clarify their procedures for appeal.
QRE 2.4.1
Signatories will describe how they provide information to advertisers about advertising policies they have violated and how advertisers can appeal these policies.
SLI 2.4.1
Signatories will report quantitatively, at the Member State level, on the number of appeals per their standard procedures they received from advertisers on the application of their policies and on the proportion of these appeals that led to a change of the initial policy decision.
Country | Nr of appeals | Proportion of appeals that led to a change of the initial decision |
---|---|---|
Global | 4,999 | 3,242 |
Commitment 3
Relevant Signatories involved in buying, selling and placing digital advertising commit to exchange best practices and strengthen cooperation with relevant players, expanding to organisations active in the online monetisation value chain, such as online e-payment services, e-commerce platforms and relevant crowd-funding/donation systems, with the aim to increase the effectiveness of scrutiny of ad placements on their own services.
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 3.1 Measure 3.2 Measure 3.3
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 3.1
Relevant Signatories will cooperate with platforms, advertising supply chain players, source-rating services, services that provide indicators of trustworthiness, fact-checking organisations, advertisers and any other actors active in the online monetisation value chain, to facilitate the integration and flow of information, in particular information relevant for tackling purveyors of harmful Disinformation, in full respect of all relevant data protection rules and confidentiality agreements.
QRE 3.1.1
Signatories will outline how they work with others across industry and civil society to facilitate the flow of information that may be relevant for tackling purveyors of harmful Disinformation.
Measure 3.2
Relevant Signatories will exchange among themselves information on Disinformation trends and TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures), via the Code Task-force, GARM, IAB Europe, or other relevant fora. This will include sharing insights on new techniques or threats observed by Relevant Signatories, discussing case studies, and other means of improving capabilities and steps to help remove Disinformation across the advertising supply chain - potentially including real-time technical capabilities.
QRE 3.2.1
Signatories will report on their discussions within fora mentioned in Measure 3.2, being mindful of not disclosing information that is confidential and/or that may be used by malicious actors to circumvent the defences set by Signatories and others across the advertising supply chain. This could include, for instance, information about the fora Signatories engaged in; about the kinds of information they shared; and about the learnings they derived from these exchanges.
Measure 3.3
Relevant Signatories will integrate the work of or collaborate with relevant third-party organisations, such as independent source-rating services, services that provide indicators of trustworthiness, fact-checkers, researchers, or open-source investigators, in order to reduce monetisation of Disinformation and avoid the dissemination of advertising containing Disinformation.
QRE 3.3.1
Signatories will report on the collaborations and integrations relevant to their work with organisations mentioned.
Political Advertising
Commitment 4
Relevant Signatories commit to adopt a common definition of "political and issue advertising".
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 4.1 Measure 4.2
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 4.1
Relevant Signatories commit to define "political and issue advertising" in this section in line with the definition of "political advertising" set out in the European Commission's proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising.
QRE 4.1.1
Relevant Signatories will declare the relevant scope of their commitment at the time of reporting and publish their relevant policies, demonstrating alignment with the European Commission's proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising.
QRE 4.1.2
After the first year of the Code's operation, Relevant Signatories will state whether they assess that further work with the Task-force is necessary and the mechanism for doing so, in line with Measure 4.2.
Commitment 5
Relevant Signatories commit to apply a consistent approach across political and issue advertising on their services and to clearly indicate in their advertising policies the extent to which such advertising is permitted or prohibited on their services.
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 5.1
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 5.1
Relevant Signatories will apply the labelling, transparency and verification principles (as set out below) across all ads relevant to their Commitments 4 and 5. They will publicise their policy rules or guidelines pertaining to their service's definition(s) of political and/or issue advertising in a publicly available and easily understandable way.
QRE 5.1.1
Relevant Signatories will report on their policy rules or guidelines and on their approach towards publicising them.
Commitment 7
Relevant Signatories commit to put proportionate and appropriate identity verification systems in place for sponsors and providers of advertising services acting on behalf of sponsors placing political or issue ads. Relevant signatories will make sure that labelling and user-facing transparency requirements are met before allowing placement of such ads.
We signed up to the following measures of this commitment
Measure 7.3
In line with this commitment, did you deploy new implementation measures (e.g. changes to your terms of service, new tools, new policies, etc)?
If yes, list these implementation measures here
Do you plan to put further implementation measures in place in the next 6 months to substantially improve the maturity of the implementation of this commitment?
If yes, which further implementation measures do you plan to put in place in the next 6 months?
Measure 7.3
Relevant Signatories will take appropriate action, such as suspensions or other account-level penalties, against political or issue ad sponsors who demonstrably evade verification and transparency requirements via on-platform tactics. Relevant Signatories will develop - or provide via existing tools - functionalities that allow users to flag ads that are not labelled as political.
QRE 7.3.1
Relevant Signatories will report on the tools and processes in place to request a declaration on whether the advertising service requested constitutes political or issue advertising.
QRE 7.3.2
Relevant Signatories will report on policies in place against political or issue ad sponsors who demonstrably evade verification and transparency requirements on-platform.