QRE 30.1.1
Relevant Signatories will report on and explain the nature of their agreements with fact-checking organisations; their expected results; relevant quantitative information (for instance: contents fact-checked, increased coverage, changes in integration of fact-checking as depends on the agreements and to be further discussed within the Task-force); and such as relevant common standards and conditions for these agreements.
Meta’s agreements with fact-checking organisations are structured to ensure transparency, measurable outcomes, and adherence to recognized industry standards.
Certifications & Standards: All Meta fact-checking partners are certified by either the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or, in Europe, the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN). Certification requires adherence to the IFCN/EFCSN Code of Principles, which are publicly available and enforce non-partisan, professional standards. Meta’s agreements mandate ongoing compliance with these codes.
Agreement Structure & Financial Terms: Meta’s agreements provide fair financial contributions to independent fact-checking organisations based on measurable outcomes.
Coverage & Partner Engagement: Meta has agreements with fact-checking partners covering all EU Member States where there are certified partners. Meta establishes clear rating guidelines and frameworks to promote consistency in how content is addressed.
Quantitative Reporting & Impact Measurement: As part of the agreement, Meta provides reviewers with access to a tool where they can see quantitative information on their fact-checking output and activity.
Further details and evidence of Meta’s partnership framework and processes are available in public documentation at Meta’s Transparency Center: Meta’s Third-Party Fact-Checking: How It Works.
_____________
Link:
https://transparency.meta.com/features/how-fact-checking-works